FinsamudraFinsamudra
Banking & NBFCsDaily brief

NCLT rejects Unity SFB's insolvency plea over 2012 default, citing time bar

A fresh loan recall notice in 2019 could not restart the three-year limitation clock on a default dated August 2012, the Mumbai NCLT bench ruled.

F

Finsamudra Desk

6 Jul 2026, 1:00 pm IST · 1 min read

August 31, 2012NPA classification date2019Fresh recall notice year3 years from first defaultIBC limitation window
You cannot sue a borrower for a default that happened over a decade ago, even if you send them a fresh demand letter today. Unity Small Finance Bank just learned this the hard way.
Image: Finsamudra LinkedIn archive

The Mumbai bench of the National Company Law Tribunal has dismissed Unity Small Finance Bank's insolvency petition against Awas Developers, not on the merits of the default but on timing.

Awas Developers' account was classified as a Non-Performing Asset on August 31, 2012. Under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, lenders have a three-year limitation window from the date of first default to file for insolvency.

Unity Small Finance Bank issued a fresh loan recall notice in 2019, arguing this reset the limitation clock. The tribunal rejected that argument outright.

The NCLT held that a borrower's default date is fixed at the moment of the original default, and a later demand or recall notice does not legally revive an expired claim. It also noted the bank's own filings cited multiple conflicting default dates, which weakened its position.

Sources

Join the conversation on LinkedIn →

Free daily briefing

The day's money story, before the market opens

The same daily intelligence 30,000+ CXOs, DSAs and finance professionals follow on LinkedIn — with the Finsamudra take on what it means for lending.